Today, at Townhall.com Kurt Schlichter has a barn burner advising that We Must Defend Self Defense. As I have continuously reminded, when a potential conflict arises, you are your own first responders. Criminals tend to avoid committing crimes in front of police officers. Therefore you are unlikely to be saved from death or serious injury by a policeman. Instead, the police will likely draw outlines around your body, and search for the killer. You must be prepared to defend your life and the lives of your family and friends. Schlichter writes:
There’s a war going on against our sacred right to self-defense, and we need to defend that right, ruthlessly and vigorously against the communists who want us living in fear. And they do want us living in fear – sheep are easier to shear than sheepdogs. If you look what happened in New York City, where some mutant bum decided to threaten a bunch of people on a subway car, and then some heroes subdued him, and then he vapor-locked, and then the usual cast of liars and race-pimps screeched, you can see what they are doing – not merely trying to disarm us but trying to make us fear to defend ourselves at all. They want you terrified and impotent in the face of their unofficial militia, the criminals. The right to keep and bear arms means nothing if you are going to get jammed up whenever you have to use hot lead to stop the latest trans shooter, or junkie with a knife, or carjacker, or schizo hobo, or whatever. Which is the idea.
So, it is the guys defending the citizens on the train who are being treated as criminals and the terminated criminal who is being treated as a hero. The message is clear – accept that you must accept abuse. Understand that this moral inversion is all a lie – the stiff was a scumbag who was a fugitive for attacking a 67-year-old woman; they just want to exploit his justified death. This is happening all over the country in the blue cities thanks to the Soros prosecutor conspiracy – and if you don’t like me criticizing Soros, shove it. Time to stop this madness, at least where we can at the moment. Time to clearly side with the normals over the criminals who the ruling caste is using as tyrannical catspaws.
Their wicked plan is perfectly obvious – to criminalize normal people and normalize criminals. Thieves, bums, losers, junkies, whores, and other trash – they are the heroes in this morally bankrupt morality play, and we normals are the villains. The first step to fighting back is to see the truth, and the truth is right there. You just have to be hard enough to accept it and to not allow them to leverage your empathy or compassion into tolerating having to be afraid as some sort of price you owe for the crime of not being a lowlife. They want us, quiet, complacent, and obedient. They want a society where we live in fear. Not them, though – this subway vermin did not invade the Met Gala last week. Hell, he would never get anywhere near the princes and princesses and princexxs strutting around in their zillion dollar gowns. Rubbing shoulders with social detritus is for you little people forced to ride public transportation – just wait until we ban your cars and trucks and you have no escape! The costs of the bourgeoisie's moral posturing is to be paid by you and me, and not by the preeners.
Schlichter is absolutely correct here. There is indeed a war on self defense. Lawyers (sorry Kurt) will make the argument that the penalty for, oh say, robbery or theft is not death. Therefore you should not use lethal force against a home invader. But here's the thing. By invading a home where the homeowner belongs, and the invader does not, the invader takes the risk of getting killed on himself. He was fully in control of his fate. He could have avoided being killed by not committing the crime-Q.E.D. In addition, the lawyers who say this assume, illogically, that the home owner can read minds. How does the homeowner know whether or not the invader means only to steal, and not to harm him? Clearly such lawuers are operating from a position of bad faith.
Schlichter then explains what changes red states must make to their laws to make self defense an acceptable response to the criminals currently rampaging through our cities. I will recommend to gentle readers that they study Schlicters ideas, and to the degree possible advance them to their legislatures. Here is his first recommendation:
First, we must reiterate in the law the guiding principle that self-defense is not merely tolerated but encouraged. We should clarify that self-defense can be used to protect people, pets, and property. And that the risk of unexpected or excessive harm is on the criminal, not the citizen. Certain situations should be presumed self-defense – like when a citizen is surrounded by a mob on foot or in a car. We need to stop acting as if you need an excuse for taking down a criminal. You shouldn’t be penalized or persecuted – you should be getting a medal.The point here is that criminals should be the ones in fear, not normal citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment