The UAP Debate

 I am bringing something a little different today, a piece on what until yesterday were called Unidentified Flying Objects, or UFOs.  Now, I don't necessarily believe in UFOs, nor do I not believe.  I am open minded concerning the existence of UFOs.  According to John Nantz at Townhall.com in a piece entitled Crash Retrievals, Reverse Engineering, And the Cost of Secrecy: The UAP Debate Unfolds, the new term is "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena."

November marked another round of historic House and Senate hearings on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). Sworn testimony was delivered before both legislative bodies, and more astounding information has been revealed to the American public through highly credible whistleblowers and government officials.

UAP is the modernized acronym for Unidentified Flying Object (UFO). The old acronym carried baggage and stigma, but more importantly, has simply become antiquated and inaccurate. The unidentified phenomenon aren’t simply flying objects, but have been observed to be trans-medium, moving with unimpeded ease between space, atmosphere, and water.

The various Congressional hearings on UAP have been, shall we say, interesting, but have been overshadowed by the political events going on.

the UAP question for most people is relevancy. However, during the November 20 Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing on UAP. Jon Kosloski, head of the Department of Defense’s UAP investigation program, the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) told the senate committee that UAP are real, there are cases that defy his understanding of physics, and that UAP are not our technology or adversarial technology. These are stunning admissions, especially in light of DOD’s decades long denial of even the existence of UAP, and active disinformation campaigns designed to discredit the topic and anyone who dares to counter the DOD narrative.

On November 13th, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability aired by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), held a UAP hearing and empaneled retired Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet, former Director of DOD’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) Lue Elizondo, journalist and author Michael D. Shellenberger, and former NASA Associate Administrator of Space Policy and Partnerships Micheal Gold. All four individuals are experts in their fields and gave testimony under oath.

Of the many points Rep. Mace made during the hearing, perhaps the most incisive was in regard to the government making disability payments to individuals who’ve suffered demonstrable harm from their work on or around recovered UAP. Her statement related directly to questioning by Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) who cleverly observed, “Well you can’t talk about fight club if there’s no fight club.” Moskowitz’s point was if the DOD required Mr. Elizondo to sign non-disclosure agreements about crash retrieval programs, then that tacitly acknowledges the existence of crash retrieval programs.

UFO, or as they are now known UAP have not inteseted me much. But the Bible does mention other intelligent beings created by God. These beings, called angels, demons, and the whole company of Heaven. Could these be the extraterrestrials that are the subject of Congressional hearings? One wonders. But please read Nantz's article, and follow further developments.