Vince Conyer has an article today at the American Thinker entitled Nineteenth Century Utah Provides a Template for Dealing With the Threat of Islam. I don't agree with his entire program, but I think he has presented a good start. We, the citizens of the United States need to devise some program to stop Islam in its tracks. Otherwise, Islam will overwhelm us. It is what Islam has done for 1400 years. It builds nothing; indeed, it is a religion of hatred and death.
You don't think that will happen. Well, here is some history. The Middle East was majority Christian from around the 3rd Century until the 7th Century. Then Islam came storming out of Arabia and now there are little pockets of Christians left. Those who remain are tortured and persecuted and murdered. While Sub-Saharan Africa was never majority Christian, the Christians living there regularly face death and persecution at the hands of Muslims.
Muslims regularly kill unbelievers, homosexuals, trans-sexual, and other deviants. That would include "furries." Say you are a principled atheist. You would be among the first to go. But say you convert to save your life. It is the ideal "religion" for the unbeliever. You don't need actual faith. The devil cannot read your inward thoughts, so as long as you do the outward minimum, you are good to go. Unlike Christianity, where faith and loyalty are the coin of the realm, in Islam, it is performing your Islamic duties. But since nobody can do everything perfectly, there are no 72 virgins awaiting Muslim martyrs. Sorry about that.
Conyer frames the problem of Islam as a danger to the republic by comparing it to Communism, a very appropriate analogy. This is because while Islam and Communism appear as polar opposites, they have much in common in practice.
Islam is not Communism, but it has at its core the goal of eliminating all other religions, quashing free speech, relegating women to 2nd class status, and replacing secular government with Sharia law. Those goals are equally as dangerous to the Republic as anything communism ever dreamt of doing. The difference is that, while the former was shunned or even denounced in the media, in academia, and among most of the citizenry, the latter is celebrated by the media and the intelligentsia while being supported by NGOs and leftist government bodies across the country.
Of course, we have a First Amendment that promises freedom of religion. That’s true, we do, but it’s not an absolute. The latter half of the 19th century saw the United States government essentially wage a 50-year war against the Mormon Church over polygamy, a core tenet of the faith. The United States did everything within its power to eradicate the practice, including outlawing the practice via law and arresting violators while Utah was just a Territory, to refusing to allow it to become a state until the practice was officially expunged. The Church finally relented and, in 1890, banned the practice, thus clearing the way for Utah to be admitted as an ultimately hugely successful state in 1896.
Polygamy—a practice that is explicitly part of Islam—is indeed problematic, but certainly far less dangerous to the nation than the threats that Islam writ large poses for America.
So, what is his proposal?
1. Explicitly outlaw Sharia law nationally and in every state.
2. Monitor and close any mosque that hosts a speaker or features an imam who calls for Sharia law.
3. Ban all funds to organizations in the US coming from nations that have Sharia law.
4. Close any school that teaches or encourages Sharia law.
5. Demand that every mosque and Muslim affiliated organization affirm that the supreme law of the United States is the Constitution and that they will not seek to undermine it, replace it with Sharia, or ngage in or support terrorism in any way.
6. After designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, do the same for organizations in the United States and beyond that support it or any other terrorist organizations.
As I have said, these are a good start. We should outlaw Sharia law as incompatible with a Constitutional republic, and we should enforce it by closing down any mosque that hosts a speaker or features an imam who calls for Sharia. You can do numbers 3 and 4 as well, though it may be tougher to enforce those. Number 5 seems almost pointless. Organizations such as CAIR might publicly say that they don't support terrorist organizations, but they would be lying under Taqiyya, the Islamic doctrine meaning to lie for the cause of Islam.
Right now, a person like Mamdani can claim to be both a Communist and an Islamist. But after these two "religions" have destroyed the United States as a world power, they will war on each other. Frankly, I will not be around for that day, thank God. But my money is on Islam.
No comments:
Post a Comment