If common sense demands a logical policy decision, Barack Obama chooses the opposite. The pattern is this: In a quest to attain an ideological goal, the president ties the nation's hands behind its back in an intentional contribution to America's weakened condition. Whether at the treaty table or making policy decisions that affect everything from the American economy to a porous border, Obama seems willing to sacrifice lives and our way of life to promote a liberal ideology that looks increasingly as though its end goal includes the destruction of America.In the Mideast, Obama tells our faithful paid ally, Mubarack, to go, but doesn't think at least a little encouragement might have been helpful when the Persians were rioting against Amadinnerjacket. Why the seemingly illogical choices? Read above.
Then, there is the Wall Street Journal editorial that complains about the decline of the Navy, courtesy of Gun Rights 4 Us. Why, when the world is getting less stable, would a President of the United States want fewer aircraft carriers, less sea power, and less ability to confront an enemy abroad. Would Obama rather have to meet the enemy at our front door? Does he actually have anyone outside of the U.S. that he considers an enemy? Read the above.
When a long train of abuses invariably points in one direction, you can only conclude incompetence by a sheer act of denial. Anyone looking at the current situation rationally would conclude the the President does not have the best interests of the American people at heart, and is actively working against them. It may be time to draft up Articles of Impeachment. Interestingly, it is not Republicans who should draft them, but the Democrats.
The Democrats?!? Strangely, yes, and I'll tell you why.
Obama is going down for the count in 2012. The Stupd Party could put up anybody, including the dead elephant himself (and they may. Never underestimate their ability to create a decisive defeat for themselves out of sure victory.) By getting rid of Obama now, they will put the affable gaff-a-matic, Joe Biden in office to complete Obama's term. But Uncle Joe stands the proverbial snowballs chance of winning the Presidency. The most likely choice for Democrats would be Hilary, who wouldn't have any real opposition. The Donkeys would perhaps give up some of their Black vote, but would gain a solid majority of the Soccer mom vote. As for the Black vote, they can write off some of it, and tell everyone else the same thing the Republicans have been telling Conservatives: Where are you going to go? The other party? Hahahahaha! In addition, impeaching Obama would allow Democrats who would like to vote to repeal ObamaCare and otherwise vote with Republicans on some issues to do so with a clear conscience, and bringing back the idea that the country is being governed by a bipartisan majority.
With Hilary as the most likely new standard bearer, what would the Republicans do. I think Romney, Gingrich, and especially Huckabee have been tried on the national stage, and been found wanting. Rubio is an untried quantity, but shows a lot of promise. Chris Christie also shows promise, though he is probably not a fan of gun rights. Bobby Jindal has been laying low lately, but he also is a possibility.
Sarah Palin would be an obvious choice. She is smart, attractive, and has a good story. She has been collecting political chits from those she endorses. Indeed, Sarah Palin can be said to have long coat tails without the usual requirement to be wearing the coat. She has a nose for politics, which is an absolute must for anyone running for President. On the other hand, she divides people like no one else. About half the women I know love her, about half hate her. She would also be facing a woman that the press loves, so they would be hiding anything that made Hilary look bad, and playing up anything they thought would make Palin unappealing. Personally, I like Palin. In the end, it would be a close match up, but Hilary would win.
Don't expect the Dems to actually pull this off. The unions and others who have invested heavily in Obama would never let them do it, though it would be the smart move. The Rs have their own reasons for not doing it. They have already calculated that an opposition party attack would force the Dems to close ranks, so that a long floor debate would eat up time without any useful outcome, and distract from the job of getting our debt under some control. So, our Country continues to sink into irrelavance, our enemies aboad and at home continue to administer the death of a thousand cuts. From what I can see, they will not stop until we are bled out.
Obama is succeeding in his mission: We are being robbed and bled out, and turned into a 3rd world sh*thole.
ReplyDelete