In his most recent post, over at Townhall.com, entitled It Is Absolutely Outrageous for the Government to Force Christians to Violate Their Faith Michael Brown asks how this can happen. The answer I think is the unspoken assumption that these poor, confused folks have no choice in the matter of being gay. While the "gay gene" has not been discovered yet, and I doubt it ever will, belief in the "gay gene" is the over riding concept that makes violating the Constitution seem acceptable. These people also view the Constitution as being written by old farts who could not possibly know what today's hip people know. What arrogance.
Remember when the mixing of two different races, was viewed by some as against God's laws. Never mind that the Bible never said a word about it. These people, having no understanding of God's law, and view Christians who will not participate in gay weddings as being just like the bigots of old. But there is a huge difference. In the old days, people who viewed mixing the races as wrong or sinful often took action to murder couples of two races. Nobody is murdering these people. They are simply asking to be left alone. The aggressors are now the ones supposedly discriminated against.
Michael Brown is right to cry foul here. While discrimination because of race is, and was wrong, and there is no Biblical basis for it, discrimination against gay behavior is not in the same class. I do not know if being gay is a choice or not, but engaging in gay behavior is. It is the behavior, not the person that results in discrimination. Say a gay person goes into a shop and wants to buy cookies. Is anyone going to refuse? No, of course not. Even if a Christian knows that the person is gay, they are not going to refuse. It is only when asked to participate in gay behavior that the Christian will refuse. And being asked to supply cakes, flowers, or a venue for a gay wedding is asking participation. In essence, the State is requiring Christians to endorse a gay wedding. The State is compelling the expression of speech in favor of gay weddings,whether one believes in gay weddings or not.
Such outrageous court rulings can not be allowed to stand. Eventually, one or more such cases will reach the Supreme Court, and it will be imperative that a strict originalist like Neil Gorsuch is on the court. In the meantime, Christians should cry out about this as often as people will listen.
The Trajectory of Collectivism
4 hours ago