A quote here:
History shows why investing in congressional candidates can maintain a favorable legal environment for future high-return litigation. Lawyers received billions of dollars in contingency fees from the tobacco settlement in November 1998, in which manufacturers were held liable for the deliberate actions of consumers. In Texas alone, attorneys were awarded $2.3 billion...As the article goes on to explain, the tobacco companies don't pay these costs, which amount to an additional tax, but rather pass the costs on to consumers, many of whom do not smoke. The gun industry is just a conveniently small and relatively defenseless industry to go after to get the precedent. Once gotten, they will go after industries where there is real money to be made. The plaintiff's bar will sue, win, and walk away with billions of dollars in fees taken from major industries. Those industries will in turn charge each of their consumers to make that up. It is outrageous and unjust.
I have no problem with all sorts of business that actually perform a useful service, or make an actual product, and sell it to willing buyers. I actually admire Bill Gates (though I don't agree with his politics.) But this system, which I'll call "jackpot justice" wherein the public is fleeced of billions of dollars, which are then transferred to trial lawyers and their lawmaker friends, has to stop. Like Cap and Trade legislation, this system bilks billions of dollars out of the hands of the public, but adds no value whatsoever. It unjustly enriches a few elites, who wouldn't be able to make it in the real world. If Democrats were really looking out for the "little guy," they would have put a stop to jackpot justice long ago. Of course, Republicans want tort reform, but that is only because they aren't getting any of the gravy.
But back to the Second Amendment, for a moment. Sooner or later the trial lawyers will find a sympathetic judge who is willing to entertain their theory, and allow the suit against a gun maker for the acts of the criminal. When that happens, it will just be a matter of time before there are no gun manufacturers left in these United States, or if there are, they won't sell to the public. Similarly, Glock and other foreign manufacturers will shy away from selling to the public. As they do now, they will be able to show that every weapon they make will be sold to a police or military agency, or to a foreign government. Of course, criminals will still be able to obtain what they need through theft and black market sources, as they do now. Microstamping, if it causes them a problem, will be relatively easily defeated. Only you, the law abiding individual, will be seriously inconvenienced.