Fighting Fire with Fire: Conservatives Need to Take Over the Democrat Party

 You may be wondering what the Left must be thinking by proposing...seriously...to defund the police.  Historically, we have not had a police force.  Thus, while, say, robbery was illegal, people had to enforce that themselves.  Wells Fargo had to hire the Pinkerton Agency to track down the criminals robbing their payrolls on trains.  Yes, we had Federal Marshals, and county Sheriffs, and some towns had town marshals and such, but over all, policing was seen as part of a citizens duties.  Thus the innovation of a paid police force that is tasked with enforcing the law was a great innovation.  We have come to rely on the police, such that most people do not carry a weapon!  But the truth is that while the police do a surprisingly good job, the citizen is still his own first responder.

So, again, what must the Left be thinking?  Gary Gindler has the answer at the American Thinker yesterday entitled The Left's Long Love Affair with Criminals. And it should come as no surprise that his analysis is true.

One shouldn't think the Democratic Party militants — formerly the KKK (by now a marginal group with almost nothing behind the website) and now the exhumed Antifa and BLM — are some kind of anomaly. Recall other leftists. Recall the Soviet Union, where criminals were viewed as "socially close elements." In contrast, politics-related people (dissidents, nonconformists, "undesirable," and other "unreliables") were viewed as "socially dangerous" or "socially alien." Who is always the first to sincerely and enthusiastically respond to the socialist slogan "rob the loot"? That's right — those who have experience in robbery and looting.

Before the left came to power, criminals were helpful to the Bolsheviks in creating chaos (read: "prerequisites for revolution"). After the left came to power, it became clear that criminals, as a rule, never intended to overthrow the existing government. As a result of this cooperation, in Russia in the 20th century, the leftists created political banditry — i.e., using criminals against "class enemies" and "politically unreliable" ones — and the American left successfully adopted the idea of using malefactors. (Should we say femalefactors or personfactors in Newspeak?)

In addition, the prevailing theory of "social Darwinism" among the left provided a simple answer to the question of where, in fact, criminals come from. It turns out that criminals arise from "unfavorable conditions." It's known that few of the Antifa and BLM mayhem participants were imprisoned — and those who were, for the most part, were released. The fact is that, according to social Darwinism, one should not punish the criminal, not put him in prison, but simply place him in other, more favorable conditions. And then — lo and behold! — the criminal will be corrected, "re-educated."

If you are one of the law abiding gun owners, you know the ones who take their concealed weapon out of the holsters to put it in a gun safe in your vehicle so you can enter a gun free zone several times a day, the acendency of the Left should concern you. And if you are a Christian who believes that the 10 Commandments were graciously carved in stone by the finger of God, Himself, and given to mankind, you can not vote for Leftists. Because Leftists look upon criminals as their friends. What is the term..."socially close?"

Another postulate of the "progressive" left is that the overwhelming majority of crimes are committed either against "capitalist society" or against "owners of private property." The conclusion the left draws from this is unambiguous: criminals are natural allies, simply because they have a common capitalist enemy. In the literature of the left, you can find many examples of the praise, glorification, and romanticization of criminals. Recall Robin Hood, pirates, Vito Corleone, and numerous friends of Danny Ocean.

...snip...

Since bandits, marauders, pogrom-mongers, and other criminals are "socially close" to the left, what should the left demand? That's right: they should demand the dissolution of the police or at least a reduction in police funding. Since the police oppose the "socially close" folks, they immediately become "socially dangerous." Leftists in Russia had dissolved police successfully. The left in America demands either the dissolution or, as a compromise, the neutralization of the police force.

The fact is that the Democrat party fits the very definition of a racketeer influenced and corrupt organization as defined by our RICO act. They should be prosecuted under the RICO act. But that will never happen. So here's an idea. Conservatives certainly need to retake the Republican party, but we also need to take over the Democrat party. Yes, we need to sign up as if we were real Democrats, become precinct chairmen and slowly take over the Democrat party. Fight fire with fire. It is what they have done to us, we need to do it right back.