Republican Complicity in Voter Fraud

 J. R. Dunn is working on a book length history of Democrat election cheating, but he offers us a very brief history at the American Thinker today entitled Democrat Voter Fraud: A Brief History.

Before getting into the actual history, let us ponder the mindset of these Democrats who cheat in elections. Now, it is clear they know it is wrong, for otherwise, why hide it? Why, for example, drop batches of ballots into drop boxes in the middle of the night, wearing latex gloves? Why did David Dinkins in New York City have preloaded voting machines with votes for him hidden in a closed school? The fact of hiding of a crime indicates a knowledge of wrongdoing. Yet they do it anyway. The rewards clearly outweigh the consequences.

Dunn is at pains to note that the Democrat party has been cheating since the days of Andrew Jackson. Tammany Hall was a massive cheating operation in New York City that started in 1789 and though no longer called by that name, continues today. It's most famous personality was boss William Tweed. But to save space in a brief article, he only goes back some 30 years. Still, the original rules apply: its not who votes that count, but who counts the votes.

I have already mentioned the David Dinkins/Rudy Giuliani race, in which Dinkins had preloaded voting machines hidden in a closed school building ready to go. Unfortunately for Dinkins, these were discovered before the election so that Giuliani won. Another interesting case is Bush/Gore in 2000.

What actually happened is that Gore’s crowd created a strategy in which every possible vote-counting method would be utilized, with recounts repeated as many times as necessary until one was finally discovered that would overturn the results. These included attempts to carry out recounts only in Democrat strongholds such as Dade County while shutting down any such efforts on the Panhandle, home to many military retirees.

The Bush campaign took Gore to court to prevent such schemes, until finally, given the opportunity at last, the Florida State Supreme Court – almost exclusively Democrat-appointed -- found in favor of Gore’s demand that ‘undervotes” – ballots showing no presidential vote at all – be counted, while at the same time “awarding” him nearly 500 votes, a novel concept unheard of in American jurisprudence up to that date.

It was here, facing the prospect of a presidential election thrown by a corrupt Democrat court in full public view and in defiance of established precedent, that the U.S. Supreme Court finally stepped in, overturning the Florida court’s decision and ending the recount circus. Bush won with 537 votes. (A later media recount showed that Bush’s lead would have held in any reasonable recount process.)

Of course, I have spoken about the Al Franken case, but Dunn tells it better:

A similar chain of events occurred in the election of Al Franken in Minnesota in 2008. Incumbent Norm Coleman originally prevailed with over 700 votes, which were mysteriously whittled down to 200 in short order. Franken called for a recount, and begorrah, the votes suddenly started appearing. Some, anyway -- an envelope of votes from one county simply disappeared, but were counted regardless, the totals evidently being read out from tea leaves. By the time it all ended, Franken was ahead by 312 votes. Coleman, a Republican gentleman of the old school, made perfunctory efforts at protest, but was undercut by the GOP itself, led by former governor Arne Carlson, a RINO to rule them all, who had refused to endorse Coleman during the campaign.

Shortly after the election, it was discovered that at least 1,099 illegal votes had been cast by felons, that this had been known during the vote count, but had been ignored. Franken exchanged his diapers for a suit and spent the better part of two terms voting the way he was told and embarrassing his party before being forced out during the “MeToo” craze.

I would also note that Franken's vote was necessary in order to pass Obamacare. It might not have passed without his vote, so Democrat cheating has real world consequences.

Dunn spends a great deal of pixels on the 2020 election. It is obvious that the presidential election of 2020 was stolen. The media keep telling us that it was the freest, fairest election ever, but we know that sleepy Joe did not get 81 million votes. Some people think that keeping Trump from winning was worth the steal, but nobody deep in his heart of hearts believes that it was legitimate.

As for cheating at the voting level, everything that needs to be said was said in 2000 Mules, which summarized True the Vote’s investigation into the “irregularities” surrounding the election. The mechanism was simple: left-wing operatives dumping armfuls of votes into isolated drop-boxes at three in the morning. Literally thousands of hours of footage of this activity exists, and is featured in the film. (My favorite bit of evidence here involves the single bust of voter fraud that occurred – in Louisiana, of all places -- A critical piece of evidence involved fingerprints on the fake ballots. Within hours, vote dumpers across the nation appeared suddenly accoutered with vinyl gloves.)

It seems to me that it would be easy enough to “debunk” this if you really wanted to – simply track down those lefty operatives (we know who they are) and find out what they were actually doing in the middle of the night dropping boxloads of ballots while wearing gloves. If they’ve got a reasonable answer, fine. But they don’t… that’s why such “debunking” has never and will never occur.

All of which brings up the 2022 midterms. Again, the media try to explain this election as somehow legitimate, but their explanations are too weak. How to explain Fetterman, a man clearly unable to do the job. Either Pennsylvanians are insane, or there was voter fraud. I think it was the latter. Or Arizona, where a popular Gubinatorial candidate who was up in the polls by double digits ended up losing. The fact that her opponent was the Secretary of State and certified her own election stinks to high heaven. The fact that voting machines suddenly malfunctioned in the largest county in the state and only in Republican districts is another odiferous fact.

Finally, Republicans have taken very little action to see to it that fraudsters receive appropriate consequences. After all, in stealing an election, Democrats have taken away the legitimate votes of Republican voters. I'm sure many Republican voters are pissed about this. I know I am. Republicans should be defending Republican voters.  Which points to either cowardice on the part of Republicans, or to complicity in the fraud. I vote for complicity, which is the saddest part of all.