Saturday, December 3, 2022

The Duplicity of the Elites, the UN, and the WEF

Let's put the swells of the World Economic Forum (WEF) underthe microscope for a change, and ask how do they live up to their own rhetoric?  In other words, make the enemy live up to their own rule book, as Alinsky would have it. 

We have lately noted, for example, Apple CEO Tim Cook, who seems to be a leftist promoting socialist and communist postions, none the less makes a handsome profit for Apple, and of course gets a handsome salary in return.  Shouldn't Cook turn over his salary to be distributed to the poor?  Isn't that what Marx advocated, from each according to his abilities to each according to his need?  Surely we can agree that Cook has great ability, but he doesn't have any greater need than anybody else.  For that matter, shouldn't Apple be run as a nonprofit, distributing excess profits to the poor? 

But what about Schwab himself?  Schwab has a personal net worth in 2022 of $1 million dollars.  Again, who needs $1 million. Shouldn't he get rid of everything he owns.  After all, Schwab has promoted that we all will own nothing and we will be happy.  Maybe Schwab should go first and show us all how it is done.

Bill Gates is an ally of the WEF, which suggests that he believes in the WEF's plans for the Great Reset.  But Bill Gates has a net worth of $114 billion.  If Bill Gates indeed supports the WEF's agenda, shouldn't he also distribute all that money to those in need?  After all, as Schwab says, we will own nothing and be happy.  Doesn't Gates want to be happy?

Of course, the other members and allies of the WEF between them either have, or control great wealth.  Yet they want each of us to be peasants who own nothing and eat bugs.  If they believed the crap they spout, they would as they say, distribute their great wealth to those in need and renounce owning anything.  But the WEF and its allies actually want, and mean to have absolute power.  It also looks like they intend to create a world wide famine.

Interestingly, along these lines, Monica Showalter has a post at the American Thinker entitled Is a manmade global famine in the works from the UN and the WEF?

So did World Economic Forum arch-villain Klaus Schwab mean "peace of the grave" in his masterplan for a global "reset" when he declared: "You will own nothing and be happy"?
Sure looks like it, given the facts painstakingly assembled by the Issues & Insights editorial team, hypothesizing that the great resetters like Schwab and all his greenie allies might just have creating a global famine in mind as their actual goal.
In a lead editorial titled "The Elites' War on Food," which asks in its subhed: "Are we in the early stages of a man-made global famine? -- the gist of the argument is that the various measures being taken around the world to assuage global warming all have the funny effect of lowering food production, intended or not, and with so much evidence piling up that these are known effects, the 'intentional' aspect of this cannot be dismissed.
The article to which Showalter refers can be found at The Elite's War on Food:
As it turns out, all this is happening at the same time “the number of people affected by hunger has more than doubled in the past three years”, according to the United Nations, as “almost a million people are living in famine conditions, with starvation and death a daily reality.”
Which must tickle the innards of the coat-and-tie savages at the World Economic Forum, a truly vile organization that has made no secret of its concerns over a growing global population, and issued a warning earlier this year that “degrowth,” the shrinking rather than growing of economies, “might mean people in rich countries changing their diets, living in smaller houses and driving and traveling less.”
Like everything the Left says, the WEF's pretty picture of life under their rule is propaganda and misdirection to keep you and me from figuring out what they are up to until they are ready to spring their traps. Now, at least two more of you know. Spread the word.

No comments:

Post a Comment