Democrats Don't Believe in Democracy

 H. Sterling Burnett as an article at Townhall.com entitled The Red Queen Would Be Proud of the Impossibly Inconsistent Climate Change Disaster Claims. Burnett:

Climate alarmists have a problem presenting a consistent narrative on the dangers supposed human-caused climate change poses.

Instead, they follow Lewis Carroll’s irrepressible and violent Red Queen down the climate change rabbit hole, as when in response to Alice’s statement that “one can't believe impossible things,” she proudly proclaimed, “I daresay you haven't had much practice. When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”

Whether it is more snowfall, or less, more rain, or less, more and more powerful hurricanes or less, the media has presented both. It is why they came up with the term "climate change." First, it was global cooling, then it was global warming, and finally climate change. And the people who believe in these theories, somehow believe in both consequences seemingly at the same time. This is, of course what is called "cognitive dissonance." As Burnette reports:

I’m weary of progressives desperately clinging to the theory of catastrophic climate change in the face of confounding data and contradictory predictions. I’m tired of their gross public displays of cognitive dissonance, twisting any unexpected weather event into further proof of climate change even when it is inconsistent with previous types of weather events they said climate change should cause or is causing.

Please, environmental socialists, move on to the next hobgoblin you will try to terrify the public with in your continuing effort to expand the government’s, and by extension your own, power over peoples’ lives. I’m ready for a new mythical dragon to slay.

Interestingly, at the American Thinker they have the answer to Burnett's request for a new mythical dragon. That answer comes to us via an article by Brian C. Joondeph, MD entitled Are Masks About To Become Permanent? After noting that between the vaccinated and those who have had the disease and recovered, we probably already have herd immunity. We also know that while the many variants seem to be more contagious, they are also less deadly.

The Copenhagen mask study found little benefit to masks in stopping the Chinese coronavirus. From a viral particle size perspective, masks also do little. The COVID virus is 50-140 nm, while the pore size in standard surgical masks is 300 nm to 10,000 nm. This is using a chain link fence to stop mosquitoes.

Is this about public health, protecting the LA population, most of whom already have COVID immunity? Or are there other motives at play? Given how so much of the pandemic has been politicized, it is appropriate to look at any new guidelines through a political prism.

Please go read Joondeph's article to understand the real reason we may all soon be hectored again to wear masks. The eternal Covid-19 may well become the new climate crisis. Because totalitarians always need a crisis. And of course, if you want to know How the Democrats Could Steal the Midterms, you will find how the Democrats may use Covid or another excuse to "postpone," read eliminate.  the midterms. Here is the problem with one party rule: the single party may not give up power.  And we know the Democrats don't believe in democracy.