Archbishop Vigano Had Trump Right

 Kennedy Hall at Crisis Magazine has an interesting article entitled Archbishop Vigano Was Right About Donald Trump.

Whatever one may think about Donald Trump, it is clear that he is a fly in the globalist ointment. Yes, my friends and colleagues who have decided to choke on red pills will say that he was always a “psy-op” or that the man was just an opportunist who feigned political ideals in order to win the greatest reality TV show in the world—the presidency.

It may very well be that the Donald is not St. Donald the Great or a Holy Catholic Monarch, but at this point I think it is foolish to think that he is just a globalist tool or an opportunist politician. Whatever he is, the Left and the Marxists hate him, and it is clear they will stop at nothing to take him, and everyone associated with him, down. For all his flaws, he is the man who brought in the judges who took away Moloch’s insatiable stranglehold over American law, which is why the so-called Trump Derangement Syndrome is clearly more like a manifestation of the demonic.

I suspect that this assessment is pretty accurate. Our God has a habit of choosing the most unlikely people to perform His work. Moses was a murderer, David killed a great many people as well, and stole his faithful servants wife. It is by choosing such flawed individuals that God shows his power. Even though the people bungle through, God somehow brings good out of evil. But it is also true that there never is a sinless person around when he needed one. But there are are flawed individuals who nonetheless say "Here I am. Send me."

One Catholic prelate understood this as much or better than anyone, and that is Archbishop Viganò. In 2020, the archbishop released a number of powerful and striking letters about then-president Trump and the impending election. In his letter from June 7, the former Nuncio to the United States began by saying that “we have been witnessing the formation of two opposing sides that I would call Biblical: the children of light and the children of darkness.”

He claimed that the “children of light” represent the majority of society and that those who have given themselves over to the dark side are in the minority, even if they are more effective or influential for the time being.

Sounds about right.