Is the Supreme Court signaling that America has crossed the Rubicon?

 At the American Thinker today, Clfford C. Nichols has an article entitled Supreme Court's failures are putting on a path to tyranny. He points out that the Supreme Court's failure to even look at the evidence of the stolen presidential election is inexplicable. The Court seems to either be thoroughly intimidated by the Democrats, or they have jumped on the fascist train coming down the track. Is there any other reason for them shirking their duty? Serious question. I can't think of one. And the idea that they have thrown in with the fascists is terrifying.

Rarely do the generation experiencing the actual events and decisions that lead to their nation's demise fully appreciate the enormity of their oversight until sometime after their culture's destruction has been rendered incurable. Largely, it is not due so much to their negligence as it is to most of them being too preoccupied with simply living and making a living.

Perhaps that would explain why, in just the first four months of 2021, the Supreme Court issued four decisions — or, perhaps better viewed as non-decisions — that should have caused all legitimately patriotic Americans to be alarmed and called to action...but did not seem to.

Only a few weeks ago, without offering any substantive explanation, the Court summarily refused to even look at — much less seriously consider — any of the evidence of the 2020 election irregularities offered by attorney Sidney Powell and others. Evidently, the Supreme Court of the United States of America was not interested in doing what it could — and should — to let America know decisively whether or not its presidential election had been shamelessly stolen by those now in power.

Why would they not do this?

Even if the members of the Court found President Trump's personal style distasteful, that should not affect their desire to correct obvious election fraud. Perhaps they believe that this was a one off, never to happen again. But that is too naïve. The Justices should realize that if there are no consequences, it will be too tempting for the Dems to do it again and again. But more than that, Americans have a right to know if, for example, Sidney Powell's assertions have any basis in fact:

Such truths should be cause for greater alarm for the American people than even the now almost Orwellian silence of John Durham. Consider the following recent words of attorney Sidney Powell:

"The Supreme Court's failure to date to address the massive election fraud and multiple constitutional violations that wrought a coup of the presidency of the greatest country in world history completes the implosion of each of our three branches of government into the rubble of a sinkhole of corruption. It is an absolute tragedy for the rule of law, the future of the Republic, and all freedom-loving people around the world."

She is not overstating the matter in the least. An American government unleashed from the constraints set in place by the rule of law can be headed in only one direction: toward some form of centralized dictatorship limited only by the whims of those in power — i.e., a tyranny.

Nichols asks if America has already passed the Rubicon? If so, is the Court signalling that they can not do anything to prevent the destruction of the Republic. Are they simply attempting to save their own hides, and those of their families? The Dems certainly seem to have the Court boxed in.